Jiddu Krishnamurti texts Jiddu Krishnamurti quotes and talks, 3000 texts in many languages. Jiddu Krishnamurti texts

1983

Bombay 1983

Bombay 3rd Public Talk 29th January 1983

It is a rather noisy place, isn't it? We have to talk over together not only this evening but tomorrow. Tomorrow will be the last talk. We have to cover a great deal during these two talks and as we are going to deal with a difficult subject, we must together perceive for ourselves what is truth and what is false; not to be told what is false or what is true, what is ignorance and what is knowledge, but to find out for ourselves a quiet corner in ourselves, living in this dreadful city, living in small spaces, dirty, working all day long, commuting, going great distances in crowded trains and buses. We must find for ourselves a quiet corner, not in a house or in a garden or an empty lane, but deep within ourselves, because from there act, live and find out for ourselves what is beauty, what is time, the nature and the movement of fear, the pursuit of pleasure and the ending of sorrow. We must have such a corner, not in the mind but in the heart, the mind in the heart because then where there is affection and love, intellect, understanding, then there comes out of that clarity and from that, there is action. But for most of us, we live such strenuous conflicting lives, so much pressure around us, such terrible things are going on in the world, if we don't find for ourselves some inward space, a space not created by thought - which we will go into when we talk about meditation and so on - but to find this space, uncontaminated, clear, in which there is a light which is not lit by another; a light to ourselves so that we are totally free.

We are not free human beings. We think we are free. We think, because we can choose, because we can do what we want, we think we are free but freedom is something entirely different from the desire to do our own thing. So we must together this evening and tomorrow find for ourselves without guidance, without help, without any outside agency telling us what to do, how to behave, what is right action, but to find in ourselves a space, that has no ending and no beginning.

And if one may point out again and I hope you will not mind, that this is not a lecture, a lecture being telling or explaining a certain subject, for you to be instructed, to learn. Lecture generally means that. But this is not a lecture. Here, we are having a conversation together like two friends perhaps walking in a quiet lane, full of trees and beauty of flowers, the singing of many birds, sitting down on a bench unfrequented, solitary and having a dialogue, because we are concerned, both you and the speaker are concerned with our daily life, not with something beyond, romantic and fantastic because if we don't make our own lives clear, unruffled, non-chaotic, whatever one may do it will have no meaning. So we must begin very near to go far. The near is what we are. So please if one may point out, it is your responsibility to think together, not to accept because one must have a great deal of scepticism, a scepticism that is not trammelled by fear, a scepticism, a doubt, so that one begins to question not only what the speaker is saying but also what you think, what you believe, your faith, your conclusions, your religion. One must have tremendous questioning, doubt, enquiry, not accept, because throughout the world, religion has played an extraordinary part in narrowing down the mind, in narrowing down one's investigation through doubt, through questioning, through deep exploration. So please we are together going to look at many things which confront our daily life. We are not going to talk about any philosophy, any dogma, or encourage any faith, but a mind that is questioning, doubting, demanding to find out for oneself what is true, what is illusory, what is fantastic and what is false.

First of all we are going to enquire together what is beauty? You may say, what has that to do with our daily life? Our daily life is rather ugly, self-centred, concerned about oneself; our daily life is a labour, conflict, pain, anxiety, and that sense of desperate loneliness; that is our daily life. And to understand that, one must not only have a great sense of perception, seeing actually what is going on.

So one of the factors of our life is time. We are going to find out together what is time, what a great part time plays in our life; and whether time which is the process of division, time which is a beginning and an ending, time which is becoming, whether that time, apart from chronological time, apart from the time of sun rising, sun setting, the beauty of the full moon and the slip of the new moon - whether time has a part in, or excludes, beauty. This is important to understand for us because we have lost all sense of an aesthetic way of living. We have lost the sense of natural beauty, not the beauty of a face only, or the good taste of clothes and so on but the quality of beauty. Beauty cannot exist without life. Beauty is not of time. Creation is not of time. We will go into that as we go along. So you must first, if you will kindly allow the speaker to go on, time is a great factor in our life. There is time by the watch, the chronological time and the time to learn a language, a skill, a time to achieve in this world, rise from a clerk to the executive person and so on. There is time in that direction. Is there time psychologically, that is, inwardly? Please enquire with me. Don't accept what the speaker is saying. Is there time which means a progress from here to there? Ideologically in the sense of becoming more noble, more free of greed, anger, violence; is there in this fear of the psyche. You understand the word psyche. This is what you are. That is, time is evolution. Right? From the seed to a tree, from the baby to manhood, the growth, the becoming, all that implies time, time as evolution.

Now we are going to question together whether there is psychological evolution at all? You understand what I am saying? Please one must exercise one's brain, think together, not just let the words flow but to think clearly, not stimulated by the speaker, but to question, to find out the implication of time. This is important because time and thought are the root of fear. Fear cannot end or fade away or be dissipated if you don't understand the nature of time and the nature of thought, which are the roots of all fear. So we are examining together the nature of time. There is physical time, the new moon becoming the full moon, the seed growing into a great gigantic tree. Time is necessary to learn a language, a skill; time is necessary to accumulate knowledge. There time is absolutely necessary. You may learn a language within a week or six months. To go from here to your house takes time; from one point to another. All physical movement, physical activity, learning requires time. The psychic, that is, the bundle of all your thinking, of all your feelings, of all your conclusions, beliefs, gods, hope, fears, all that is a bundle, that is your consciousness, that is what you are. Is that clear? That is what your consciousness is. Your consciousness is made up of all these things - your gods, your knowledge, your faith, your hope, your fears, your pleasures, your conclusions, your loneliness, and the great fear of sorrow, pain. All that is your consciousness. We are asking whether that consciousness has evolution at all? Evolutions means becoming what you are more and more and more. You have understood this? That is, I am greedy, envious, violent. Can greed evolve into non-greed, or anger, loneliness become gradually something else? Are we making things clear? Or have we all gone to sleep after a hard day?

Please, this is rather a difficult subject, because all our tradition, all our religious training, our belief, our faith and all the so-called sacred literature tell you that you will become something if you make an effort, if you strive after, if you meditate from this to that, from what you are to what you should be, that is evolution. Now, the speaker is denying all that. Do you understand? The speaker is saying, greed can never become better greed. There is only the ending of something, not becoming something. Most of you probably believe in reincarnation. I don't know why - it is fairly obvious why, why you believe in it, that is from this life to next life, where you have better opportunities, where you will be a little bit nobler, where you have a little more comfort, more enlightenment; that is from what you are, to become what you should be. That is called evolution. The speaker is questioning that. He says there is no such thing as psychological evolution. You have to understand the nature of that statement, what is implied. That enlightenment, deep perception of that which is true, that is which is beyond time is not through progress, through a continuity. So there is no movement as evolution of the psychic, which means there is no becoming. I don't become noble, I don't achieve enlightenment if I practise, if I strive, if I deny this or control and so on, which is gradation in achievement. So one has to understand the nature of time. Time, as we said, essentially means to divide, break; time implies a beginning and an ending.

So we are going to talk over together the nature of fear; whether fear can end now or it must end gradually. You understand the point? We are used to the idea that gradually we will be free of fear, which is, I am afraid but give me time I will be over it. Please don't look at me, it's not worth it. Just think together. So we are going go find out for ourselves whether fear can disappear through time or the very time itself is the root of fear? Is that clear? So what is the root of fear? Please enquire together. What is the root of fear, what is the cause of it? What is fear? You all know what fear is - fear of not becoming, not achieving, fear of the dark, fear of authority, fear of your wife or husband, fear has many, many aspects. We are not concerned with the many facets of fear, or wipe away one or two fears. It is like cutting the branches of a tree, but if you want to destroy the tree you must uproot the tree, go to the very root of it. So we are together and please look at your own fear. You may put on saintly robes, take vows and all that kind of stuff, but there is fear in you.

So look at that fear. What is that fear? Fear of an accident, fear of disease and of course there is the ultimate fear which is of death or the fear of living. And most of you who put on these strange robes and garlands are frightened of living. It makes no difference. What the speaker is saying will make no difference to those who are dressed in this fancy dress, will it? They go on because they have got this idea that fear can be surrendered to an idea and they will be free of it. Fear is much too deep to surrender it or to dispel it or to control it or to suppress it. One must enquire into the root of it. What is the root of fear? Is it not time, is it not remembrance, is it not an experience which you have had which was painful and the fear of it recurring again, fear of disease; these are all the symptoms. We are not dealing with symptoms. We are concerned whether it is possible to uproot totally all fear.

If that is clear that we are concerned not with a particular fear, not your own special neurotic fear but the nature, the structure, the cause of fear, because where there is a cause, there is an end. So we are going together to find out the cause. We are saying one of the causes of fear is time, that is, the future, the fear of what might happen; fear of the past which is time, which is a remembrance, which is thought. So we are asking, is time and thought - are they the root of fear, are they the cause of fear? I am afraid of what might happen. That is the future. Or I am afraid of something that has happened in the past that might happen again, that is, the past invading the present, modifying itself and going on. Right? So time is one of the factors of fear. It is so obvious isn't it? Now we am asking whether thought is also a factor of fear, and if there is a difference between time and thought. Can you bear all this? Can you go on with this or are you getting tired already?

We are saying that thought and time are the root of fear. We explained somewhat; you can work it out for yourself the nature of time. Time is division as yesterday, today and tomorrow. Time of something that has happened which was painful a week ago and might happen again. The remembrance of the past projecting into the future and we are afraid of that which might happen. Now is thought one of the causes or the cause of fear? So what is thought? What is thinking? The most ignorant, who does not know how to read or write, who lives in a small village, poverty ridden, unhappy, he thinks too, as you think, as the scientist thinks. So thinking is shared by all. So it is not your thinking. It is not individual thinking. I know it is difficult to accept this. Go into it. You think at the moment, I hope. And we are asking: is thought one of the factors of fear? And so we are investigating what is thinking. Thinking is shared by all humanity whether the most educated, sophisticated, rich, powerful and all the rest of it, or by the most simple ignorant half-starving person. It is common to all, therefore it is not your thinking. You may express your thinking differently and I may express it in different words, but the fact is that we both think and thinking is not yours or mine. It is thinking.

So what is thinking? Why has it become so extraordinarily important in your life? Please understand this. Give your mind to this. Because love and thinking cannot go together. Compassion is not the product of thought. Love cannot exist in the shadow of thought. Love is not remembrance. So we must understand, please give your heart and mind to the understanding of this, that thinking is common to all of us. It is not individual thinking. You may express it differently and another express it differently, most scholastically, most capable but another may not. But thinking is shared by all.

So what is thinking? When that question is put to you, you begin to think, don't you, or do you listen to the question? If you listen to the question, which is, your mind is not interfering with your conclusions, with your ideas and so on. If you are listening with all your attention, which means with all your senses totally awakened, then you will see for yourself what is the origin of thinking. The origin of thinking is experience. Experience gives knowledge, whether it is scientific knowledge or the knowledge about your wife or husband. Experience, knowledge, stored in the brain as memory and response of memory is thinking. Right? This is very simple. It is a fact. You cannot think if there is no memory, if there is no knowledge, if there is no experience. So thinking is a process of time. Right? Because knowledge is a process of time, and knowledge being never complete about anything, including your wife or your husband or about your guru, knowledge can never be complete, therefore thought can never be complete, it must always be fragmented. Is that clear?

So fear is the child of thought. Right? I am afraid because I have done something not right, that I might be condemned for it. That is, to think about it. You understand this is simple enough. So thought and time are the factors of fear.

Now, is thought different from time, or thought is time? Thought is a movement, isn't it? It is a material process. Whatever thought has done is material. Your gods are created by thought; your rituals are created by thought; all the things that go on in the name of religion are created by thought: the gods, the gurus, everything is created by thought. And thought being limited, fragmented, because knowledge is limited, and all action then becomes limited. And where there is limitation, there must be fear. So we are asking, do thought and time work together or are they different? Or there is only thought which, divides as time, as progress, as evolution, as becoming? Sirs, as we said, please explore all this, search out. Don't let your brains become dull by knowledge, by doing all the rubbish we do. Life is both intellect, emotion, senses. But if you let thought dominate them all, as we do, then our life becomes fragmented, shallow, empty.

We ought to talk over together what is love: would you say that you love somebody, love without attachment, love without jealousy? If there is attachment, there is no love. If there is any kind of antagonism, hate, love cannot exist. Where there is fear, love cannot exist. Where there is ambition, love cannot exist; where there is power of any kind, the other cannot be. If you have power over your wife or if you possess your husband, if you are ambitious, then love is not. So we are asking, do you love, because without love, suffering will go on.

So we ought also to enquire - perhaps not enquire - search out, seek out whether there is a possibility of ending sorrow because all these are linked together. Sorrow is not different from fear. Sorrow is not different from thought. Sorrow is not different from hate, the wounds, the psychological wounds that we receive. They are all related to each other. It is one issue, not separate issues. It is something that you have to approach wholly, not partially. But if you approach it intellectually, ideally or idealistically, romantically, then you don't see the wholeness of life. So we are asking, we are searching out if there is a possibility of ending sorrow.

Fear, pleasure, and sorrow have existed from time beyond thought. Man has always had these three factors in life - fear, the pursuit of pleasure and sorrow. And apparently man has not gone beyond that. They have tried every method, every system that you can think of: they have tried to suppress it, they have tried to escape from it, they have tried to invent a god and surrender all this to that invention, but that has not worked either. So we must find out whether sorrow can end. And to understand the nature of sorrow, the cause of sorrow, is the cause different from fear, is the cause different from pleasure, pleasure of achievement, pleasure of possession, pleasure of having great power, pleasure of talent, pleasure of wealth. I do not know if you have not noticed, this country is becoming more and more materialistic. Money matters an awful lot to all of you and yet you go and worship not god, money. If you are pursuing the path of material happiness, you are going to end up in such chaos. And the world is doing that. There is threat of war - the atom bomb. That is the end of materialism. But you don't understand all this.

So let us find out whether sorrow and fear can ever end? And the pursuit of pleasure is infinite, is endless, not only sexual pleasure, the pleasure of becoming something, the pleasure of achievement, the pleasure of being attached to somebody, whether that attachment is to a person, to an idea or to a conclusion. And while you are pursuing that pleasure, there is always the shadow of fear with it. And where there is fear, there is sorrow. So please don't take one thing as though it is something separate - fear is separate. But they are all together, they are all interrelated and one must deal with them all wholly, not separately. If that is clear and we are not dealing with sorrow separately, as though it was something different from fear. So we are looking, searching out the nature of sorrow and the ending of sorrow because where there is sorrow there is no love. Sorrow expresses itself in so many ways: the sorrow of loneliness, the sorrow of seeing this vast country - poverty, corruption, utter disregard for another human being, carelessness. When you watch all this day after day that is also sorrow. The utter neglect of all the politicians right all over the world, they only want power, position and where there is power, there is evil. And sorrow is the loss of some one you love, whatever that love may mean. Sorrow of losing, sorrow of ending something you have cherished, something that you have held on to; the sorrow of doubt, the sorrow of seeing one's own life such an empty shell, meaningless existence. You may have money, sex, children, be very fashionable, rich but it is an empty life. There is no depth in it. Seeing that, perceiving the nature of it, is also sorrow. The sorrow of a man who has everything and nothing. The sorrow of ignorance. So can sorrow end? It is not your sorrow, it is also mine and anothers. Don't deal with sorrow as your particular precious stuff; it is shared by all humanity. But when you deal with it as your particular sorrow, your private quiet sorrow, it is the sorrow of all human beings, whether you are a man or a woman, rich or poor, sophisticated or at the height of your excellence.

So please do not deal with all these factors like fear, pleasure, sorrow, love and so on as something separate from each other. All that is yours, your secret pleasure, your secret sorrow. You must approach this whole thing wholly, not fragmentarily, if you approach it fragmentarily you will never solve it. You see this country is separating itself from all other countries. America is separating from all other countries. England, Russia and each country is trying to solve its own problems - poverty, lack of food, ignorance - not of books, that is fairly cheap, but ignorance of oneself. So either the politicians awake one day and see there must be a global relationship, not national relationship, global human relationship. One wants to cry when such appalling things are going on. So please look at greed, pain, sorrow, as a movement of life, as a whole movement of life, not something different from life. This is our daily life. And to find out whether there is an end to all this - to misery, to conflict, pain, sorrow and fear - one must be able to perceive them, one must be able to be aware of them. So we must understand what is perception, how to look at all this? Is the observer who looks at all this - the poverty, the loneliness, the anxiety, the uncertainty, the suffering - is all that different from the observer or all that is the observer? I will explain this.

We have separated the 'me' who is the observer, as different from that which he is observing. I say I am suffering, and I say to myself that suffering must end, and to end it I must suppress it, I must escape from it, I must follow a certain system. So I am different from fear, from pleasure, from pain, sorrow. Are you different from all that? Or you may think that there is something in you which is totally different from all that. If you think that, that is part of your thought, and therefore there is nothing sacred there. So, please, is the observer different from the observed? Don't make it absurd. You see a tree and when you say, am I different from the tree, you are I hope. But when you are angry, envious, brutal, violent, are you not all that? The meditator is the meditation. Yes, sir, think about it. So the observer is the observed. See the importance of this. Before we have divided the observer from the observed. That means there is a division between that and the other. So there was conflict. You could then control it, suppress it, fight it, but if you are that, if you are sorrow, if you are fear, if you are pleasure, you are this whole conglomeration of all this. And to realize that fact is a tremendous reality. Therefore, there is no division and therefore there is no conflict. Then the observer is the observed. Then a totally different action takes place, a totally different chemical action takes place.

It is not an intellectual achievement, but to see the truth of it, not the intellectual concept of the truth but to see the fact that you are not different from your qualities. You are not different from your anger, jealousy, hatred, but you are all that. You know what happens when you realize that, not verbally but inwardly? Find out. You are waiting for me to tell you? I won't! You see how your mind works. You are waiting for me to tell you. You don't want to find out. If I tell you then you will say, yes, right or wrong, but you will go on, But when you find out for yourself the actual truth of it, that the observer is the observed, the watcher is the watched. When you watch the moon, the full moon of yesterday rising out of that smog, that moon is not you, unless you are loony. But you are the whole bundle of your consciousness, the content of your consciousness is what you are and the content of that consciousness is put together by thought. Now to find out, not the ending of thought but to find out how to observe the content. When you observe without the division, then a totally different action takes place. Where there is love, there is no observer, there is no you and the one that you love; there is only that quality of love.

1983

Bombay 1983

Bombay 3rd Public Talk 29th January 1983

Texts and talks of Jiddu Krishnamurti. Krishnamurti quotes. Books about
J Krishnamurti. Philosophy.

suntzuart

the 48 laws of power